Escape from Planet Earth
By John F. Walvoord
Our modem world in the twentieth century has provided an
amazing combination of events and situations that compare to
the end times predicted in the Bible. Major events of the future
begin with the rapture of the church, referring to the catching up
of the church from earth to heaven. But significantly, the Bible
never mentions a specific sign for the rapture itself, because it is
always presented as an imminent event that could take place at
any moment.
What can be the meaning, then, of talking about signs of the
rapture? Being enacted before our eyes in this twentieth
century is a preparation of the world's stage for events which
will follow the rapture. These are detailed in both the Old and
New Testaments, providing a panoramic view of the
tremendous climax of human history leading up to the second
coming of Christ. But the rapture comes first, and this event has
no specific signs preceding it. What the world is seeing today is
the preparation for events that will follow
the rapture. Logically, this means that the rapture itself could be
very near. This is the point of all the discussion concerning
current events which are viewed as prophecy being fulfilled
today.
Paramount, however, in all the evidence for the coming of the
Lord is the fact that the Scriptures themselves provide the
details for what is necessary to support the conclusion that
Christ is coming for His own. Fulfillment could be any day. A
study of the prophecies concerning the coming of Christ is still
our best proof for the imminence of these earthshaking events.
Principles of Interpreting Prophecy
In the exercise of interpreting prophecies of the Bible, there has
been a woeful neglect of basic rules of interpretation. This has
resulted in prophecies being wrongly claimed as currently being
fulfilled, as well as other important prophecies being ignored. It
is amazing to see books on the end times that just skip, for
example, the rapture and proceed as if we are already in the
great tribulation. To avoid this interpretive error, we must
understand clearly the rules of interpretation of prophecy.
First of all, the context of any prophecy needs to be thoroughly
explored and understood. Second, it is most important to
examine the details of the prophecy and carefully go over each
aspect of the prophetic interpretation. Third, it is necessary to
understand that prophecy is usually literal and given in plain
statements of Scripture. To be sure, symbolic and
apocalyptic presentations of prophecy appear in many
passages, but even here the Bible itself interprets these
symbols as prophetic predictions. It simply is not true that
prophecy is a hopeless puzzle that no one can understand.
The main points of prophecy are clearly written in the scriptural
record.
Once the facts of prophecy are determined, then the practical
application of the prophecy can be attempted. In the case of
prophetic interpretation, this emphasizes the importance of being
ready for the coming of the Lord. If His coming is truly
imminent, it is of utmost importance to have assurance of
salvation, commitment of life and property to the Lord, and a life
of purity and devotion to the Lord. As given in Scripture,
prophecy always has a practical context. In other words, it is
intended not only to teach but also to exhort.
In carrying out these basic rules of interpreting prophecy, it is
necessary first of all to examine carefully the Old Testament to
see what it reveals and what it does not reveal and then to
continue in the new revelation given in the New Testament as
well. A careful search of all prophecies reveal that there are at
least a thousand basic passages on prophecy in the Bible, some
single verses and some whole chapters; of these thousand
passages, 500 have already been literally fulfilled. This provides
a reasonable and intelligent basis for assuming that prophecies
yet to be fulfilled will likewise be literal in their fulfillment. With
these facts in mind, it is very important then to ask: Mat was
intended by the prophecy? To whom was it given? And what would
be the normal comprehension of it?
The Coming of Christ in the Old Testament
In the Old Testament, not only are there hundreds of prophecies,
but many of these are of major impact upon the history of the
period. Beginning in the Garden of Eden, God told Adam and
Eve that they would surely die if they partook of the forbidden
fruit. When they sinned against God
and partook of the fruit, they died spiritually immediately and
ultimately physically.
The major predictions of the flood were literally fulfilled. Abram
received extensive prophetic revelation, much of which has
already been precisely fulfilled. Abram became a great man in
history and in the Bible. He was the progenitor not only of the
nation of Israel but of many other ancient nations as well.
Through him came the line that led to Jesus Christ and provided
blessing to all the world. This is summarized in three very
important verses in Genesis 12:1-3.
To Abraham also was given the important promise that his
descendants would inherit and possess the Promised Land
(Genesis 12:7). One of the major mistakes of prophecy is to
refuse to take this literally and instead try to equate this land
with heaven. Throughout the Old Testament, every use and
reference to the word "land" refers to real estate: what is
commonly known as the Holy Land, extending from the River of
Egypt to the River Euphrates, as detailed in Genesis 15:18-21.
The departure of the children of Israel to Egypt was predicted in
Genesis 15:13,14, and their return was literally fulfilled. Though
they wandered for 40 years in the wilderness, they eventually
conquered at least a major portion of the land.
As long as Israel obeyed the law, God blessed them in the land.
But it was freely predicted by Moses that if they disobeyed the
law, they would be scattered and driven out of the land
(Deuteronomy 28:58-68). This was tragically fulfilled, first by
the Assyrian invasion of the land in 722 B.C. (2 Kings 17:5-8),
when the ten tribes were carried off captive. Later, in 605 B.C.,
Jerusalem was conquered by Nebuchadnezzar, and
subsequently captives from Judah were carried to Babylon (2
Kings 24:8-16).
In the midst of Israel's apostasy, Jeremiah the prophet, who had
predicted the Babylonian conquest of Judah, predicted that after
70 years God would bring the captives back from Babylon to
Israel (Jeremiah 29: 10). This was literally fulfilled after the
Medes and Persians conquered Babylon. Though their history
was troubled, the Jewish people eventually built the temple. In
the time of Nehemiah they built the wall, and then in the years
following Nehemiah they rebuilt the city of Jerusalem, replacing
its ancient ruins. In all of these predictions there was literal
fulfillment of the many prophecies that dealt with the nation of
Israel as well as the nations that surrounded them.
Throughout the Old Testament, however, there also was
prediction of the coming of the Messiah. The prophecies of the
coming of the Lord as the Jewish Messiah and King of the line
of David are interwoven with the major prophetic revelations of
the Old Testament. As early as Genesis 3:15 it was predicted
that the coming Son of the woman would destroy Satan. In the
promise to Abraham, the Coming One was not only indicated to
be the son of Abraham but it was also predicted that He would
be a blessing to the entire world. This was fulfilled in Christ's
death, as mentioned previously in Genesis 3:15. Intimately
related to all of this was the fulfillment of the promise of the land
as Israel's everlasting inheritance.
Later in the Old Testament, in the covenant with David (2
Samuel 7:12-16), God promised to perpetuate the kingdom of
David, which ultimately would be fulfilled by the coming of the
Messiah. Psalm 89 repeats and reiterates the unconditional
nature of this promise that is related to the second coming of
Christ. In connection with Israel's restoration, there is a time of
terrible trouble spoken of as the great tribulation (Daniel 12: 1),
which would be ended, however, by the restoration of Israel
(Jeremiah 30:5- 11).
The fact that
Israel would be restored to her land in connection with the
fulfillment of the Davidic covenant is the major theme of
Jeremiah 31. In Ezekiel 39:21-29 the promise is given that all
Israelites would be regathered to their Promised Land at the
time of the coming of the Messiah except for those who are
purged out. In Ezekiel 20:33-38 it is clear that the rebels are
unbelievers who will be purged out in that regathering. Only
those who have come to trust in their Messiah will enter the
Promised Land. Ezekiel 48 pictures the 12 tribes of Israel, each
with its own inheritance in the Promised Land following the
coming of the Messiah.
The prophecy of a Messiah who would suffer and die, as
predicted in Isaiah 53 and Psalm 22, alongside these promises of
glorious restoration, puzzled the rabbis as they attempted to
interpret the Old Testament. This is mentioned in I Peter 1:10,11.
It is most important to realize that the Old Testament in its
prediction spoke of both the first and second comings of Christ,
but no one understood that they were two separate events. The
first coming would involve His sufferings and death and
resurrection, while in the second coming He would conquer the
world and reign gloriously on earth. Interpreters of the Old
Testament, however, never understood that there were two
comings, and they attempted to merge these two conflicting
predictions into one major prophecy. Though they gave various
explanations, probably the most popular one identified the
sufferings of Messiah with the sufferings of the nation of Israel
but predicted the glorious reign of Christ as being brought about
by His first coming. As far as Scripture reveals, nobody in the
Old Testament or in the gospel period, except for Christ Himself,
understood that there were two separate comings of Christ. This
is most significant in considering the problem
of separating the rapture from the second coming, except that
this time thousands of people can see the difference.
It is most important to understand that the Old Testament, in its
presentation of the coming of the Messiah, was universally
misunderstood. The result was that the disciples came to follow
Christ anticipating the fact that He would be a glorious reigning
Messiah but ignoring the fact that He had to die first. And Christ
did not immediately correct the disciples' anticipation. It is
doubtful whether they would have followed Christ if they thought
He was going to die and not fulfill His role of leadership.
However, in the events leading up to His death, He predicted on
several occasions that He would be crucified and die and then
be resurrected (Matthew 12:38-42; 16:21-23; 17:22,23; 20:17-19;
Mark 10:32-34; Luke 18:31-34).
The disciples immediately rejected this concept and so
thoroughly erased it from their minds that when Christ actually
died they did not recall His predictions of His death and
resurrection. By contrast, the enemies of Christ remembered;
they appointed soldiers to watch the tomb and sea] it to make it
impossible for anyone to steal the body. Their attempts only
added to the certainty of the fact that Christ actually rose from
the dead in spite of the efforts to prevent removal of the body.
The disciples were not credulous and eager to believe the fact of
His resurrection; instead, they required solid proof-as given in
the tomb and the appearances of Christ-that He was actually
raised before they would accept this important miracle in
fulfillment of prophecy.
In view of the many attempts to interpret Scripture as not
teaching an imminent return of Christ in the rapture, it is a
common interpretation by posttribulationists (who put the rapture
at the end of the tribulation) and amillennarians (who ignore the
rapture) also to insist that the disciples knew all about the rapture
and therefore understood
the predictions of the second coming as referring to the rapture.
Actually there is not a scrap of evidence anywhere that indicates
the disciples understood anything about this. How could the
disciples understand the doctrine of the rapture as distinct from
the second coming when they had not even comprehended the
difference between the first and second comings of Christ?
In interpretation of prophecy, it is most important not only to
observe in great detail what is said but also to carefully examine
what is not said, and there is no mention of a rapture anywhere
in the Gospels until the prediction in John 14. The fact that the
disciples could not distinguish the first and second comings of
Christ explains how some today have difficulty in distinguishing
the rapture and the second coming. The reason these two events
are properly distinguished, however, is based upon the biblical
facts concerning them as two events that are totally different in
what they accomplish. Also, the context of what precedes the
rapture and the events that follow are in sharp contrast.
The First Prophecy of the Rapture
As the public ministry of Christ had moved on to more than three
years, the disciples were beginning to despair whether His
promises of a glorious reign were going to be fulfilled as they had
anticipated. They saw instead a weakening of His followers,
with many disciples turning away, and they were aware of the
activities of the leaders of Israel to capture Christ and put Him to
death. All these problems did not indicate any progress toward
their goal of a glorious reign of Christ on earth. This was the
reason they came to Christ in Matthew 24 and asked the
questions concerning the signs of His coming and the end of the
age.
As the disciples gathered in the upper room on the night before
His crucifixion, Christ seized the opportunity to give them what
hope He could. Their problem was that Christ told them He was
to leave them and they could not follow Him. Also, one of their
number was going to betray Him. They could not understand any
of these predictions because they did not fit into their scheme of
Christ gloriously reigning on earth. In the context, John 14
records the first revelation of Christ's coming to take His own
out of the earth.
The entire fourteenth chapter of John is directed at the anxiety
of the disciples. It gives them assurance that God is on the
throne and will certainly fulfill His plan and purpose for the world
and for His own. Christ exhorts them not to be troubled. The
first thing He mentions is the fact that He would be going to
heaven to prepare a place for them, and then come back to
receive them to Himself: "In My Father's house are many
mansions; if it were not so, I would have told you. I go to
prepare a place for you. And if I go and prepare a place for you,
I will come again and receive you to Myself; that where I am,
there you may be also" (John 14:2,3 KJV).
It should be quite clear that the disciples did not have the
slightest idea as to what Christ was talking about. There was
nothing in their understanding of endtime prophecy that involved
Christ coming to take His own out of the world. What they were
anticipating was the kingdom on earth, in keeping with the Old
Testament prophecies of Christ gloriously reigning on earth. Had
not the Lord also assured them that they would sit on thrones
judging the 12 tribes of Israel (Matthew 19:27-30)?
Christ made no attempt to explain the doctrine of the rapture to
them or even to correct their misunderstanding of His future
kingdom. The dark days that followed as they watched Him die
on the cross were left without relief until He rose from the dead
and the disciples were assured of His resurrection. It is doubtful
that even then they understood the difference between the first
and second comings of Christ.
Later, when they saw Christ ascend into heaven, it apparently
gradually dawned on the disciples that His sufferings and death
had to do with His first coming, and that His second coming was
to be fulfilled in a future event when He would return. They
probably had no idea how long this period would be (which has
now stretched to almost 2000 years). They anticipated the
possibility that He might come back to establish His kingdom
while they were still living.
The doctrine of the rapture was given by revelation to Paul.
While undoubtedly the other disciples heard about it, it is not clear
from the New Testament whether all the apostles understood
that Christ would come for them first before He came to
establish His kingdom.
The Revelation of the Rapture to Paul
When the apostle Paul was arrested in his mad course of
persecuting Christians on the road to Damascus, he ultimately
went through an experience of being taught by the Lord in
special revelation the great truths that characterized his later
writings. He was indoctrinated into the truth of grace, which
apparently he had not completely understood in his life as a
Pharisee, and in addition he was given the great revelation of
Christ's next coming to take His own out of the world.
In his missionary journey, Paul incorporated these two main
doctrines into his preaching, teaching first that Christ had come,
died for our sins, and rose again, and is now able to save all those
who put their trust in Him. This was coupled immediately with
the truth that Christ might come at any time to take His own out
of the world.
This truth is detailed for us in Scripture in connection with Paul's
ministry to the Thessalonian church. Acting on divine instruction,
he had left Asia Minor and gone over to Greece to preach at
Philippi and then later at Thessalonica (Acts 16:8-10).
Paul's painful experience at Philippi, where he was beaten and
placed in prison, did not deter him from preaching the gospel
boldly at Thessalonica. As was his custom, he had gone to the
synagogue there and preached the gospel to both Jews and
Gentile converts for three Sabbath days (Acts 17:1-4). However,
because of threats on his life on the part of those who rejected
his message, he thought it best to leave.
Later, while in Athens, Paul had sent Timothy, his young disciple,
to the Thessalonian church to see how they were getting along.
Timothy found them standing true to the faith in spite of terrible
persecution, and he did what he could to reassure them and
encourage them. However, they had some important doctrinal
questions which Timothy could not completely answer. So
Timothy took those questions back to Paul for his consideration.
One of the questions concerned some of the Thessalonians who
had already died: If the Lord came for those living in the rapture,
would they have to wait for some future time before their loved ones
would be resurrected? In his first epistle to the Thessalonians, Paul
expressed his joy at their standing true to the faith, but he also
answered their theological questions and gave them more detail
than
anywhere else in the Scriptures concerning what would happen
at the rapture of the church.
As stated earlier, it is most important to pay close attention to
what is said and what is not said. So many wrong interpretations
of the rapture come from neglect of the details or refusal to
accept the revelation itself. As stated in I Thessalonians 4:13,
Paul said, "I do not want you to be ignorant, brethren, concerning
those who have fallen asleep, lest you sorrow as others who
have no hope." God has a purpose in giving prophecy. If one-
fourth of the Bible was prophetic when it was written, it
certainly is evident that God does not want us to neglect this
important truth, as many do today. It is also essential to listen
carefully to what God says because there are no inaccuracies in
His Word and nothing is omitted that is important to us. God
does not want us to be ignorant or uninformed.
In Paul's letter to the Thessalonians, he addressed them as
"brethren." Belief in the rapture is not essential to salvation, as
there are thousands of Christians today who are ignorant of this
great truth. Salvation relates to the first coming of Christ and
what Christ did for us on the cross. There is an important
reason, however, for understanding this truth of the rapture: Paul
does not want us to have hope without content. While many
Christians believe they are going to heaven, they are practically
at a loss to state anything about this event or what their state
would be or when this would occur. Paul makes it clear that it is
God's purpose not to keep us ignorant or uninformed but to give
us a wonderful hope, in contrast to a world with no hope at all.
This wonderful hope is particularly brought out in a Christian
funeral. On one occasion I attended the memorial service of an
11 -year old girl who had died of leukemia. Her parents were
prominent Christian workers. The church was packed with well-
wishers and sympathizers. It was a glorious
occasion, however, as the girl's family and friends recounted the
wonderful hope that they would see their loved one again. When
Christ comes, the family will be reunited. What a difference if
the little girl had not been a Christian and the parents had not
been Christians! What could extend any hope or comfort to
those left behind? In proportion as our future with the Lord is
real and our personal love for the Lord and desire to see him is
real, so will prophecy become real for us as we attempt to
understand what God has predicted in His Word.
In 1 Thessalonians 4:14 the absolute certainty of the rapture is
revealed: "For if we believe that Jesus died and rose again, even
so God will bring with Him those who sleep in Jesus." The death
and resurrection of Christ was a major subject of Old Testament
prophecy. Implied in all the passages of His glorious reign is that
after His death He would need to be raised from the dead. Now
that Christ has come, however, and has died and been
resurrected, it is prophecy fulfilled. There is absolutely no
uncertainty about the prophecy having a literal fulfillment.
From the divine point of view, prophecy is just as certain as history. From the human point of view, however, it is
reassuring to see that predictions are literally fulfilled. Today we
can believe with certainty that Christ died and rose again. Paul's
argument is that, just as the death and resurrection of Christ, a
central doctrine of the Christian gospel, is true, so the rapture is
also absolutely certain and absolutely true. In describing this
event he is predicting what actually will happen.
When the rapture occurs, Christ will take the souls of Christians
in heaven and bring them with Him as He comes back to the
earthly sphere. When a Christian dies, a medical doctor can
declare a person dead because the signs of life are absent.
Theologically, a Christian who dies experiences
death when the soul leaves the body and goes immediately to
heaven, as indicated in 2 Corinthians 5:8. It is customary,
however, to put the body of Christians who have died in the
grave. When the rapture occurs, Christ will bring the souls of
these from heaven back to the earthly sphere with the obvious
purpose of causing them to be raised from the dead, and the
soul will reenter the resurrection body.
Paul follows this with a detailed description of exactly what is
going to happen on the occasion of the rapture. As stated in I
Thessalonians 4:15-18:
For this we say to you by the word of the Lord, that we who are
alive and remain until the coining of the Lord will by no means
precede those who are asleep. For the Lord Himself will
descend from heaven with a shout, with the voice of an
archangel, and with the trumpet of God. And the dead in Christ
will rise first. Then we who are alive and remain shall be caught
up together with them in the clouds to meet the Lord in the air.
And thus we shall always be with the Lord. Therefore comfort
one another with these words.
First of all, Paul points out that this is not a revelation of the Old
Testament, and he does not quote Old Testament passages
dealing with the second coming; rather, it is a new truth given by
direct revelation. He then describes the scene: Christians who
are alive at the time of the rapture will not precede those who
have died. One of the problems of the Thessalonian church was
that they were concerned that, when those who were living
were raptured, their dead brethren would not be raised. But
Paul replied that there was no need to worry about this issue
because their resurrection would precede by a moment the
translation and rapture of
the living Christians. He then described how the Lord would
bodily descend from heaven to the air above the earth.
Though Christ is everywhere, omnipresent in His divine deity, in
His resurrected human body He can be in only one place at a
time because this is the nature of a body. At the rapture He will
come bodily from heaven as a token of the importance of this
event. He will issue a shout which is also a command of
resurrection to Christians all over the world who have died.
Their souls will reenter their bodies. He will command living
Christians to be caught up and meet Him in the air. Living
Christians will experience what Paul later described in his first
letter to the Corinthians indicating that our present bodies, which
are subject to death and corruption and sin, will be exchanged
for bodies that are suited for heaven. Paul writes in I
Corinthians 15:51-53:
Behold, I tell you a mystery: We shall not all sleep, but we shall
all be changed-in a moment, in the twinkling of an eye, at the
last trumpet. For the trumpet will sound, and the dead will be
raised incorruptible, and we shall be changed. For this
corruptible must put on incorruption, and this mortal must put on
immortality.
Taken with 1 Thessalonians 4, the 1 Corinthians passage gives a
complete picture of what will happen on the occasion of the
rapture.
When the trumpet sounds, not only will the dead be raised with
new bodies that will be suited to be in the presence of the Lord
forever, but the living Christians who now have sinful bodies and
experience mortality and age will be instantly changed into
bodies which will last forever without sin and without corruption.
Three basic problems of the human body will be settled
instantly. First, our present bodies have a sin nature,
as indicated in Ephesians 2: 1, and they are not suitable for the
presence of the Lord. Second, our bodies grow old, and we need
a body that does not deteriorate. Third, our bodies are subject to
death, and we need bodies that are immortal. All these changes
will take place instantly when the trumpet of the rapture sounds.
Christians who died would be resurrected a moment before
Christians who are living are translated. According to I
Thessalonians 4:17, we will be caught up or raptured with those
resurrected. There is no record that Christ's feet will ever touch
the earth at the time of the rapture. Instead, Scripture predicts
that we will be forever with the Lord.
John 14:1-3 indicates that when Christ comes for us He will take
us to the Father's house, which is heaven. In other words, we
will not be floating around in space right after the rapture, but
will go immediately into the presence of the Lord. This is
anticipated, for example, in I Thessalonians 3:13, which teaches
that we will be presented before God our heavenly Father.
The reference to the clouds could refer to atmospheric clouds,
which would also characterize the second coming. Some believe
that the reference is to the multitude or "clouds" of those who
are resurrected or translated, similar to Hebrews 12: 1, which
speaks of a cloud of witnesses. From then on we will be
wherever the Lord is, whether in heaven in the Father's
presence during the terrible time of tribulation, on earth during
the millennial earth, or in the new heaven and new earth (and
the new Jerusalem) for all eternity. The assurance of this plan of
God is a comfort to us because these promises are given as
something that could occur at any time. It is a reminder of how
our present time of suffering and bereavement may be suddenly
cut off by that trumpet sound from the blue.
It is most important to realize that the scriptural rapture is totally
different from the picture of the second coming as given in
Revelation 19:11-16. Here Christ comes back to the earth with
the purpose of judging the world and bringing His kingdom to
bear upon the earth. He is accompanied by the armies of
heaven, including the angels and the saints, and the church,
which had previously been raptured. They all come to be with
Christ during His thousand-year reign on earth. While many
questions are left unanswered, the main facts are perfectly clear
for anyone who will accept what the Scriptures say. At the time
of the rapture there is no judgment on earth and there is no
heavenly host accompanying Christ, for His purpose in this event
is to take the church to heaven. In contrast, His purpose in
Revelation 19, where He comes from heaven to earth, is to bring
His judgment and power to bear upon a wicked earth. The fact
that no intervening events are ever mentioned between the
present moment and the rapture gives assurance to believers,
even if they differ on many other points of prophecy, that Christ
could come very soon.
The Rapture and the Day of the Lord
After the rapture is described as an imminent event, it is only
natural to ask: Men will it occur? First Thessalonians 5 deals
with this issue. In this connection a new term is introduced: "the
day of the Lord." Most expositors hold that the reason the day of
the Lord is introduced is that it begins at the time of the rapture.
This is commonly held not only by pretribulationists but also by
posttribulationists.
The problem then becomes the question, Mat is the day of the
Lord? An examination of the Old Testament reveals that the
day of the Lord refers to any period of God's intervention in the
affairs of man in judgment. The day of the Lord
sharply contrasts the present time, which is the day of grace.
Frequently God brought upon Israel invaders, failure of crops,
drought, pestilence, and other difficulties referred to in the
Scriptures as a "day of the Lord." Typical is the passage found in
Joel 1: 14-20:
Consecrate a fast, call a sacred assembly; gather the elders and
all the inhabitants of the land into the house of the Lord your
God, and cry out to the Lord.
Alas for the day! For the day of the Lord is at hand; it shall
come as destruction from the Almighty. Is not the food cut off
before our eyes, joy and gladness from the house of our God?
The seed grain shrivels under the clods, storehouses are in
shambles; barns are broken down, for the grain has withered.
How the beasts groan! The herds of cattle are restless, because
they have no pasture; even the flocks of sheep suffer your
punishment.
0 Lord, to You I cry out; for fire has devoured the open
pastures, and a flame has burned all the trees of the field. The
beasts of the field also cry out to You, for the water brooks are
dried up, and fire has devoured the open pastures.
Joel goes on to speak of the day of judgment as the day of the
Lord. Frequently in the Old Testament, the prophecy goes
beyond the immediate judgment of God to the ultimate day of the
Lord which precedes the second coming. This is the content of
Joel 2: 1 - 11. Also in the same chapter is the dramatic passage
of 2:30-32:
I will show wonders in the heavens and in the earth: Blood and
fire and pillars of smoke. The
sun shall be turned into darkness, and the moon into blood,
before the coming of the great and terrible day of the Lord. And
it shall come to pass that whoever calls on the name of the Lord
shall be saved. For in Mount Zion and in Jerusalem there shall be
deliverance, as the Lord has said, among the remnant whom the
Lord calls.
Here are the promises that a day of divine deliverance will come
at the second coming of Christ. Most of the book of Joel is
occupied with not only the theme of judgment but also the theme
of deliverance, as in chapter 3. Some of the historic applications
to Israel are also found in Amos (see 5:16-20). The theme is also
picked up in Isaiah 13:6-16. All of this forms a dramatic
background for the declaration that the future day of the Lord
will begin at the rapture.
Some of the particulars of the period of judgment following the
rapture are itemized in 1 Thessalonians 5. The day of the Lord is
declared to come as a thief in the night, just as the rapture
occurs. That is, there are no warnings and it can be expected at
any time. In I Thessalonians 5:3, the proclamation of peace and
safety which follows the covenant of Daniel 9:27 at the
beginning of the seven years is interrupted as the great
tribulation begins when the covenant is broken and sudden
destruction comes upon the people. Christians are described as
those who live in the light not in the darkness, whereas those
who live in that future period are described as living in darkness.
An important fact is presented in I Thessalonians 5:9: "For God
did not appoint us to wrath, but to obtain salvation through our
Lord Jesus Christ." In contrast to the day of the Lord, the time
of divine wrath, Christians are not appointed to that day. In other
words, we are appointed to a different time frame, namely, the
period before the day of
the Lord. If the day of the Lord is fulfilled in the period
preceding the second coming of Christ, then it should be obvious
that the rapture of the church also precedes this time of
judgment when the day of the Lord will begin.
The Rapture and the Man of Sin
An important and additional predictive revelation is found in 2
Thessalonians 2. Here the context is very important. It is clear
from 2 Thessalonians 2 that between the two epistles false
teachers had come in who were legalizers and who had told the
Thessalonian church that the sufferings which they were going
through in their persecution were those of the day of the Lord.
In other words, the day of the Lord had already begun. They
claimed that this was the teaching of Paul and that they had
manuscripts and special messages from him to this effect.
When Paul heard of this, he was of course indignant that the
Thessalonian church was alarmed. Were they going to go
through the day of the Lord, or had they missed the rapture and
therefore were already in the day of the Lord? In either case,
they had reason for alarm.
In chapter 2 of 2 Thessalonians, Paul addressed this problem
directly. He began by reminding them of his teaching which they
had heard when he was there. In 2 Thessalonians 2:1 he wrote,
"Now, brethren, concerning the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ
and our gathering together to Him, we ask you." He was
specifically speaking about the coming of Christ and our
gathering or rapture on that occasion. He followed in verse 2 by
observing that they are not to be disturbed, as if there had been
a message from God by a spirit or by word or by letter from
Paul. He stated that they should "not ... be soon shaken in mind
or troubled, either by spirit or by word or by letter, as if from us,
as though the
day of Christ had come." (In many texts the word "Lord" is used
instead of Christ.") Paul stated in verses 3 and 4:
Let no one deceive you by any means; for that Day will not
come unless the falling away comes first, and the man of sin is
revealed, the son of perdition, who opposes and exalts himself
above all that is called God or that is worshiped, so that he sits
as God in the temple of God, showing himself that he is God.
The expression "that Day will not come" is of course added to
the text. It is not in the original, but it brings out the point of what
is being discussed in the sentence. Two things in particular are
mentioned as having to occur before the day of the Lord can
come: a falling away, referring to doctrinal apostasy, and a
revelation of the man of sin, who is the future Antichrist and
world ruler and who is described in verse 4 as the one who in
the great tribulation occupies the temple and is worshiped as
God. Paul reminded the Thessalonians that he had taught them
about this when he was with them.
What does it mean when the day of the Lord comes? This point
is often obscure in current exegeses of this passage. Note that
the passage does not say when the day of the Lord begins. As a
time period, it begins at the rapture but comes when the major
events take place. To illustrate this concept, consider the
statement "When the Fourth of July comes we will have a
parade." This does not refer to 12:01 A.M. on July 4; it refer to 10
A.M., the time of the parade. The day begins at 12:01 but it comes
at 10 A.M. In other words, he is referring to the first major event
after the day of the Lord begins, and this is the revelation of the
man of sin.
Prophecy here requires reconstructing the major events of the
end times in their chronological order. This
is commonly neglected in most works on prophecy but is
essential to understanding the period.
When the rapture occurs, several Scriptures indicate that either
immediately before the rapture or immediately afterward there
will be a revival of the ancient Roman Empire in the form of ten
countries, as predicted in Daniel 7:7. As pointed out in previous
chapters in this book, Europe is ripe for just such an arrangement
because the countries of Europe for the first time in centuries
are on a friendly basis in which they can easily get together
politically, as they are currently attempting to do in the common
economic market.
When they are formed as a ten-nation group, a dictator will rise,
described as the little horn of Daniel 7:8, and he will apparently
conquer three of the ten countries. From then on Scriptures
regard him as the ruler of all ten, though no explanation is ever
given as to why the other seven capitulate. It is obvious that
when he conquers the three countries, he will already be
identified as the man of sin and the future dictator and Antichrist,
and when he conquers all ten, this will be further confirmed.
From his position of power, the man of sin will bring about the
covenant of Daniel 9:27, which describes the last seven years
leading up to the second coming of Christ. It is the final seven
years of Israel's prophesied prophetic program, 483 years of
which were completed before the crucifixion of Christ. The
present age has intervened. The last seven years will be
resumed when this covenant is signed. According to Daniel 9:27,
the first 3 1/2 years will be a period of relative peace, though it
may include the invasion of Israel and the sneak attack by six
nations as described in Ezekiel 38 and 39. In the middle of the
seven years, however, the covenant will be broken and the
leader of the ten countries will assume control over
the entire world by proclamation.
This will begin the world government of the end times, of which
the Antichrist will be the head.
Scripture describes him as being aligned with Satan (Revelation
13:1-4). His supernatural powers apparently come from Satan
himself. He will demand that everyone worship him at the pain
of death. Those who do not worship the world ruler as well as
Satan will be put to death (Revelation 13:15). The full revelation
of his character and evil attributes will appear when he breaks
the covenant with Israel at the beginning of the last 3 1/2 years.
It should be obvious, however, that this is the final climax rather
than the beginning of the revelation of who he is. Actually he is
identifiable as soon as he has control of the three countries of
the Roman Empire, and then the ten countries later. When he
makes the covenant with Israel for seven years, he is certainly
the same person who at the middle of the seven years becomes
the world ruler aligned with Satan.
What Paul is teaching in 2 Thessalonians 2 is that the man of sin
cannot be revealed until after the rapture. If he is revealed more
than seven years before the second coming of Christ, then the
rapture has to occur before the seven years, and this wipes out
all the contenders for posttribulationism, partial rapturism, or
midtribulationism, leaving only the pretribulational view as that
which is in harmony with the Scriptures.
Paul further supports this idea of a pretribulational rapture by
calling attention to the fact that the day of the Lord cannot begin
until the restrainer of sin is taken out of the way (2
Thessalonians 2:7). While there is debate as to who this person
is, obviously the suggested powers for good such as human
government do not exist in the endtimes because the government
is wholly evil. It certainly is not Satan himself, and the historic
answer based on Genesis 6:3 is that the ultimate One who
restrains sin is the Holy Spirit. As He is
indwelling the church prior to the rapture, the Holy Spirit is not
free to be "removed." But if He is removed, the church would
have to be removed with Him. This does not mean that He is
entirely taken out of the earthly sphere, but that He is removed
in the same sense as when He came on the day of Pentecost.
He will still be in the world; people will still be able to be saved
by Him, but He will lift the restraint of evil that now exists
because the church indwelt by the Holy Spirit influences the
world with its moral principles. It may fairly be concluded that it
will be impossible to remove the Holy Spirit in the sense given in
2 Thessalonians 2:7 unless the church is also raptured.
Accordingly, Paul offers two major arguments here. One, they
are not in the day of the Lord because the man of sin has not
been revealed; and two, the restrainer has not been removed.
This effectively presents a scriptural basis for the pretribulational
rapture which is no longer just an inference but the result of
biblical exegesis.
The Practical Value of the Rapture
The fact that Christ could come any day and remove His church
from the world is a dramatic fact of our current civilization. If
there are many evidences in the world that the world scene is
set up for precisely what the Bible predicts for the days after the
rapture then it is also clear that the rapture itself is not only
imminent but that it could be very soon. This has tremendous
practical implications.
First of all, it raises the question for everyone concerning
personal salvation. Only those who are born again and who have
the life of Christ in them will be raptured. They are the ones who
are in Christ by the baptism of the Holy Spirit. It may be debated
whether the Old Testament saints are raised at the same time or
later at the second coming, but it is clear
that the rapture of the church is imminent. If it is true that our
lives may suddenly be cut short, it makes time very precious.
The challenges of full commitment to Christ, proper use of our
opportunities for witness, and proper investment of our
substance in the Lord's work all become very acute and
important.
The Bible does not suggest radical means of approaching this
commitment, such as giving away all our property or making no
plans for the future. Even Paul, who believed in the rapture of
the church, made plans for the future until he knew for sure that
he was going to be executed before the rapture. Instead,
Scripture calls for a "far view" as well as a "near view" of the
future. In other words, we should be living in such a way that we
will have no regrets if the Lord should come any day; on the
other hand, we must have a reasonable plan for the extension of
our lives to their normal limits in case the Lord's coming does not
occur in our lifetime.
Few doctrines of the Scriptures are more dramatic, more
practical, and more applicable to the challenges of our present
life before the Lord. John recorded all the dramatic prophecies
that deal with the second coming, including the millennium and
the eternal state, but ended his treatment of it with a prayer:
"Even so, come, Lord Jesus!" (Revelation 22:20). This sentiment
could also be applied to the whole scenario of Christ's second
coming, but John, like other Christians, anticipated that before
these events would take place he would have the joy of being
caught up to heaven if the Lord came in his lifetime. We too can
be looking up to the blue, waiting for that joyous event of the
coming of the Lord and the trumpet sound that will signal the end
of our earthly pilgrimage and the beginning of our glorious
experience in the eternal presence of our Savior.